<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REVIEW: Robin Hood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegown.org.uk/2010/05/29/review-robin-hood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegown.org.uk/2010/05/29/review-robin-hood/</link>
	<description>A free, fortnightly independent student newspaper at Queen&#039;s University Belfast.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:29:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Shearer</title>
		<link>http://thegown.org.uk/2010/05/29/review-robin-hood/comment-page-1/#comment-3323</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Shearer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegown.org.uk/?p=2306#comment-3323</guid>
		<description>Exactly, well said.  I friend of mine thought it would have been better entitled Robin Hood Begins, although it&#039;s got nothing on Batman Begins clearly.  That &quot;water bellowing&quot; moment defines not only the ideas of the film, but the mentality of Crowe...not much to be desired.  Yeah it didn&#039;t do anything that the audience could link to the legend of Robin Hood, and as some might view this as a bold move, I think it was a bad one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, well said.  I friend of mine thought it would have been better entitled Robin Hood Begins, although it&#8217;s got nothing on Batman Begins clearly.  That &#8220;water bellowing&#8221; moment defines not only the ideas of the film, but the mentality of Crowe&#8230;not much to be desired.  Yeah it didn&#8217;t do anything that the audience could link to the legend of Robin Hood, and as some might view this as a bold move, I think it was a bad one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien E</title>
		<link>http://thegown.org.uk/2010/05/29/review-robin-hood/comment-page-1/#comment-3302</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 22:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegown.org.uk/?p=2306#comment-3302</guid>
		<description>I got the impression that this literally could have been about anybody, rather than specifically Robin Hood. Crowe&#039;s accent was poor, as was Kevin Duran&#039;s, who just seemed entirely confused as to where he was supposed to be from. The end-battle had one awful cringe-worthy moment, with Crowe coming up out of the water bellowing...Enough said. 

I just think the entire film was a bit of a money spinner setting up for the next installment. They literally could have made one film, and explained Robin&#039;s background either through flashbacks, or subtitles at the start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the impression that this literally could have been about anybody, rather than specifically Robin Hood. Crowe&#8217;s accent was poor, as was Kevin Duran&#8217;s, who just seemed entirely confused as to where he was supposed to be from. The end-battle had one awful cringe-worthy moment, with Crowe coming up out of the water bellowing&#8230;Enough said. </p>
<p>I just think the entire film was a bit of a money spinner setting up for the next installment. They literally could have made one film, and explained Robin&#8217;s background either through flashbacks, or subtitles at the start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

